With the ever-tightening
environmental regulations facing today's metal working industry, managers
of the American metal working plants are recognizing what those in the
aerospace industry , the plating industry and the electronics industry
have known for a relatively long time - water is not just water. Rather
the quality of the water used in a manufacturing process can dramatically
affect the quality of the product, the efficiency of the process, the
maintenance costs of the process machinery and the useful life of any
process chemical bath.
It is primarily
in relation to this useful life of chemical baths that managers are
beginning to recognize the effect of water quality, generally the purer
the water the greater the useful life of the chemical bath. And the
greater the useful life, the less material which must ultimately be
processed for disposal.
CUTTING FLUIDS
Water soluble cutting
and grinding fluids are chemical baths; that is they are composed of
fluid concentrate diluted normally from one to ten percent with water.
Water then amounts to 90 to 99 percent of the cutting or grinding fluid
in the machine coolant sump. Poor quality ( High mineral content ) water
dramatically affects the performance of the fluid, as follows:
Hardness minerals
( primarily calcium and magnesium chlorides and sulfates ) affect the
chemical, semichemical and emulsion type fluids, and result in gummy,
sticky, residues, separated emulsions and tend to foster microbial growth.
Nonhardness minerals
( Primarily sodium and potassium chlorides and sulfates ) affect all
types of water miscible fluids, and are frequently the cause of corrosion
problems associated with these fluids.
Sulfates ( sodium,
potassium, calcium and magnesium ) all act as oxygen sources for sulfate
reducing bacteria, which are responsible for liberating hydrogen sulfide
gas - commonly referred to as "Monday-morning stink" in metal
working shops.
Virtually all water-miscible
fluids are formulated to overcome some of the detrimental effects of
minerals dissolved in the water with which the concentrate is mixed.
Generally, cutting fluid emulsifier systems contain both anionic and
nonionic wetting agents; the latter are unaffected by hardness salts
present in the water. But nonionic wetting agents, while able to overcome
some effects of hardness salts, make poor cutting fluid lubricants and
tend to form stable foams, which can cause operational problems with
some coolant systems.
Anti-corrosion systems
in the fluid will suppress the corrosive effects of the acid radical
(Cl4 or SO ) of the dissolved minerals in the water supply. However,
the corrosion inhibitors will tolerate only certain concentrations of
these salts before there effectiveness is overwhelmed. The effect of
these chloride and sulfate ions in the coolant is perhaps most noticeable
when machined parts are stacked wet and allowed to dry in tote boxes.
Staining of corrosion is frequently found on mating surfaces of these
parts after a relatively short time and this staining is usually directly
attributable to the presence of these ions in the coolant solution trapped
between parts.
This latter point
is important because a machine tool coolant sump acts like a still at
room temperature and much of the daily coolant usage is actually replacement
of water lost by evaporation. Whatever salts were present in the evaporated
water are left behind in the coolant solution in the machine sump. Consequently,
although a coolant solution starts off with a relatively good water
the accumulation effect rapidly converts the water in the sump to a
poor quality water.
WATER IMPROVEMENT
Since water quality
affects the performance of water-miscible cutting and grinding fluids
and the performance of the fluid affects the efficiency of the manufacturing
operation, what options does the manager have in regard to the quality
of water?
To date, the majority
of metal working plants have done nothing to improve water quality.
Typically, they continue to use raw water or untreated water supplies,
either private wells or public water systems. The quality of such sources
ranges from very good to very bad. One metalworking plant uses a private
artesian well, which produces water containing about 9 ppm total dissolved
solids, about half a grain, and is almost as pure as distilled water
while another plant's water system contains over 110 grains per gallon
total dissolved solids. The majority of metalworking plants mix coolant
concentrates with waters varying from four to five grains( considered
to be moderately hard ) to 15 to 20 grains ( considered to be very hard).
In some metalworking
plants with extremely poor quality water, managers have chosen to improve
water quality by installing water softening equipment. Water softening
is a process in which hardness mineral ions are exchanged for the nonhardness
mineral ion ( sodium ) by passing water through an ion exchange resin
bed. The ion exchange bed is a pressure-tight tank filled with ion exchange
resin ( tiny, porous, plastic beads which carry a negative electric
charge ), and the necessary plumbing and controls to affect water flow
through the bed as well as periodic regeneration of the bed. As water
flows through the bed, calcium and magnesium ions absorb onto the resin
particles and in so doing, replace sodium ions present on the resin
particles. Thus, calcium and magnesium ions are exchanged for sodium
ions.
Periodically, the
ion exchange bed is regenerated with a saturated salt ( sodium chloride
) solution. The highly concentrated sodium ions replace the calcium
and magnesium ions previously removed from the water, and the bed is
rinsed to remove excess salt. The resin bed is now recharged or regenerated
with sodium ions and ready to soften more water.
The total amount of
dissolved solids present in softened water is not appreciably different
from the hard water. But the nature of the water is different in that
the calcium and magnesium salts have been exchanged for sodium salts
and the sticky, gummy residues which result when mixing coolant concentrates
with hard water are no longer a problem. However, coolants mixed with
softened water have a greater tendency to cause corrosion than coolants
mixed with either hard or demineralized water.
Three processes are
available to remove dissolved minerals from water: (1) distillation,
(2) reverse osmosis, and (3) Deionization.
Distillation is the
process by which dissolved minerals are removed by first evaporating
the water ( thereby leaving the dissolved solids behind ) and condensing
the water vapor. Distillation is extremely effective in producing high
quality water but has drawbacks of requiring high initial investment
and being both energy and maintenance intensive. The cost of water produced
by distillation is relatively high.
Reverse osmosis is
a technique whereby relatively pure water is produced by forcing water
through a semipermiable membrane under high pressure. Water molecules
pass through the membrane while the majority of dissolved ions are filtered
out by the membrane. While the process does improve water quality, it
does not produce water of sufficiently high quality for use with water
miscible fluids; typically, only 90 percent of the minerals are removed
from the water supply. Further, the membranes have relatively unpredictable
lives and relatively high replacement costs and approximately half of
the water fed to the system goes down the drain as waste.
Deionization is the
process by which dissolved minerals are removed from water by passing
the water through ion exchange beds. Both negatively and positively
charged ions are removed to produce the equivalent of distilled water
with a much lower installation, operating and maintenance costs than
distillation equipment.
THE DEIONIZATION
PROCESS
Deionizers are similar
in operation to the water softeners described previously. The major
difference is that softeners consist of a single ion exchange bed wherein
sodium ions are exchanged for calcium and magnesium ions, whereas deionizers
are composed of two ion exchange beds:
1. A Cation exchanger
wherein hydrogen ions are exchanged for all cations present in the water
supply, normally sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and aluminum.
2. An anion exchanger
wherein hydroxyl ions are exchanged for all anions present in the water,
normally sulfates, chlorides and carbonates.
Whereas softeners
are regenerated with sodium chloride, deionizers normally utilize hydrochloric
acid to regenerate the cation and sodium hydroxide to regenerate the
anion exchanger, although other regenerating chemicals can be used in
certain instances.
Generally, deionizers
can produce water equivalent in quality to distilled water for pennies
per gallon. This cost includes the equipment purchase price amortized
over five years and the cost for regenerant chemicals used over that
same period. The cost per gallon varies with the relative quality of
the water being Deionized ( the better the quality, the lower the cost
) and the amount of water required. Since a deionizer has a fixed minimum
cost, the greater the amount of water that is Deionized the less the
equipment costs per gallon. Deionized water can reduce coolant consumption
as much as 80 percent and normally 30 to 40 percent compared to mixing
coolant concentrate with raw water.
Deionized water can
also greatly extend the sump life of water-miscible fluids. Theoretically,
if the coolant sump can be kept relatively free of tramp lubricating
and hydraulic oils and other contaminants, the fluid could have virtually
unlimited sump life. However let us assume Deionized water would only
extend sump life from three to four months. Such an extension would
save one machine pump-out and cleaning per year. If machine cleaning
is done during production time and requires three hours for each cleaning,
it would cost $36.00 to clean a manual turret lathe, assuming the machine
carries a burden rate of $12.00 per hour.
In addition to lowering
coolant consumption and reducing machine cleaning and pump-out costs,
Deionized water can reduce machine corrosion problems. Simultaneously,
it will reduce the tendency for bacterial growth in coolants. In summary,
a small expenditure for improved quality of the water used to dilute
water-miscible coolants can produce major savings in overall plant maintenance
costs as well as major increases in overall plant efficiency. MMS
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
As general manager
of Master Chemical Corporation's Systems Equipment Division, William
A. Sluham directs the design, manufacture and marketing of Master Chemical's
closed loop coolant systems. Upon graduation from Ohio Wesleyan University
in 1964 with majors in chemistry and business administration, Mr. Sluthham
joined the Master Chemical Corporation as a salesman. After serving
two years in the US Army, he returned to Master Chemical Corporation
as assistant to the Sales Manager and Director of Product Service and
Evaluation, responsible for the field testing and evaluation of research
and development products. In 1973 he was promoted to Vice President
Operations, and assumed his present responsibilities in 1976.