P2 sustainability: Ultrafiltration Scores a Win for P2
By Barbara
Quinn
Productivity,
like pollution prevention, is a process rather than an event.
Few people appreciate that more fully than Mary Beth Schwefel,
who serves in the dual capacity of Finishing Engineer, and
Environmental, Health and Safety Manager for Metcam Inc. The
perspective born of her professional responsibilities has
provided Schwefel and Metcam, a manufacturer of precision
sheet-metal components and assemblies, with a unique opportunity
to pursue pollution prevention initiatives.
|
Facing the challenge
Metcam
manufactures components and assemblies for a broad range of
industries, from telecommunications and electronics to medicine
and food service. The company employs around 60 people at its
100,000 square foot plant in Alpharetta, Ga.
After the sheet-metal components are laser cut, punched, bent
and welded, the parts move to the finishing department. Aluminum
parts are subjected to a chrome conversion before some are
powder coated. Cold rolled steel and galvanized parts are
pretreated through a five-stage iron phosphate washer and powder
coated.
This five-stage iron phosphate washer spray deserves a closer
look.
- Stage 1 involves a 1,250-gallon alkaline cleaner solution
with surfactants operating at a 3.5 to 4 percent
concentration, with water pressure of 15-18 psi at the nozzles
and temperatures of 135°F. The alkaline cleaner removes oil
and grease from the parts, thereby preparing them to accept
the iron phosphate or powder coating. The sodium hydroxide
solution is purchased as a liquid, which is formulated with a
silicate builder and nonionic and anionic surfactants. Stage 1
is followed by a spray rinse (Stage 2) using city water.
- Stage 3 centers on iron phosphating, which minimizes
corrosion of the part. The first step is the dissolution of
the metallic iron in a phosphoric acidic solution. As the acid
attacks the metal surface, it is consumed, raising the pH of
the liquid. The change in pH causes phosphate salts to
precipitate and react with the metal surface, forming a
crystalline coating that locks paints or powder onto the part
and acts as a barrier to the flow of electrons. The third
stage is followed by another spray wash (Stage 4) using city
water.
- Stage 5 is the non-chrome seal, which enhances under-paint
corrosion resistance on the surface of the iron
phosphate-coated steel.
Keeping the rinse water at a sufficiently high quality level
is critical to the efficiency of the finishing process. The
rinse from Stage 2 is particularly sensitive to the amount of
oil carried over from the Stage 1 cleaner, and the Stage 3
process cannot operate effectively if more than 100 ml of oil
per liter of rinse is carried over from Stage 2. To ensure
process efficiency, Metcam was forced to dump Stage 2 rinse
water every other production day. In addition, as the cleaner in
Stage 1 approached its six-month bath life, the quality of the
solution carrying over to Stage 2 deteriorated. Maintaining the
quality of its finishing line was of paramount importance to
Metcam, but it was also expensive. Metcam estimated that it
spent $35,515 every year just to generate Stage 1 and Stage 2
wastewaters, with evaporation costing approximately $0.31 per
gallon of wastewater.
Managing the wastewater it generated added even more cost and
headaches. Without access to a sewer connection, Metcam weighed
two options: sending the waste offsite for treatment and
disposal, or reducing the waste by evaporator onsite and sending
the residual sludge offsite for final disposal. Evaporation
represented the most cost-effective solution, but Metcam
recognized that minimizing or even eliminating wastewaters at
their source would be a much more effective solution. Explained
Schwefel, "We were interested in finding an alternative to the
two traditional options available to metalworking operations.
Fortunately, the state of Georgia was just as interested in
finding alternative methods to minimize waste. With the help of
the state's P2 division (P2AD), we entered into a program to
test a pollution prevention option."
That option, one of three that had been considered, was
ultrafiltration (UF). After more than six months of testing, the
results are impressive.
|
Minimizing waste through ultrafiltration

Smaller washer apparatus |
Metcam's
filtration system reduces both Stage 1 and Stage 2 wastewater at
the source, extends alkaline cleaner bath lives and reduces dump
and recharge costs.
Unlike a traditional filtration system that can foul within a
short period of time, a cross-flow filtration system lets the
membrane surface receive continuous "sweeping," thereby limiting
the fiber cake buildup and extending processing times. In a
crossflow UF system, contaminated cleaner solution is pumped
across the membrane at relatively low pressures. Solution flow
is parallel to the filter pores while a tangential pressure
transports water, dissolved salts/metals and low-molecular
weight cleaner compounds through the membrane pores to the
cleaner bath. All suspended solids and soluble materials
rejected by the membrane move away in a continuous, turbulent
flow at the membrane surface.
The UF system that Metcam employed was designed to separate
high molecular weight, colloidal or suspended solids from
water-based cleaning solutions. Constructed of a semi-permeable,
sintered titanium dioxide membrane attached to a tubular,
stainless steel substructure, the membrane had a nominal pore
size of 0.1 microns.
The system configuration chosen by Metcam is known as "batch
with recirculating loop, top-off." In this system, the feed rate
to the process tank from Stage 1 is equal to the permeate flux
rate. A counter-flow rinse system, which works synergistically
with the UF system, ties Stage 2 and Stage 1 together, allowing
for reuse of Stage 2 water to make up for Stage 1 evaporation
and dragout losses.
|
Performance and results

Paint is applied after parts are cleaned and iron phosphated |
Metcam's UF
system was online independently from Jan. 2 to March 10, 2003;
since then, the UF system has worked in conjunction with the
automated rinse counterflow system. Of particular interest to
Metcam and Georgia's P2AD was the system's ability to rejuvenate
dirty cleaner bath and the extension of the bath's life before
dumping and recharging was required. When the project started,
the cleaner was judged to be equivalent to a six month bath. If
the UF system could rejuvenate Stage 1 to the quality of a new
bath, there was a solid likelihood that the system could keep
the bath operating for a very long time without the need for
dumping or recharging.
The UF system turned the 1,250 gallons over in just about ten
days, transforming a cloudy, orange-brown liquid into a much
clearer, orange-yellow bath after just one month. By April 2003,
Metcam saw a steady performance in contaminant removal and
recovery. "The system has been up and working," said Schwefel,
"and the results are as good, or better, than we had
anticipated. We've gone months without adding chemicals, and
that saves money. We're well on our way to being ISO
14000-compliant, and our employees are working in an improved
physical environment. But, we're also seeing some unexpected
benefits. Our employees don't have to clean out the tanks nearly
as often, and that's a dirty, messy job. And our customers are
very positive because our quality has remained excellent at the
same time that we've implemented these major environmental
improvements. With this system, everyone wins." PE
|
Barbara Quinn has written about environmental, public policy and
economic development issues for more than 25 years. Her work has
been published in magazines that serve the industrial,
environmental, municipal and business communities. |