Home

Washer Washer Recycling System

Sales Rep Access

Washer Washer Questionnaire

Contact Us

Menu

P2 sustainability: Ultrafiltration Scores a Win for P2
By Barbara Quinn

Productivity, like pollution prevention, is a process rather than an event. Few people appreciate that more fully than Mary Beth Schwefel, who serves in the dual capacity of Finishing Engineer, and Environmental, Health and Safety Manager for Metcam Inc. The perspective born of her professional responsibilities has provided Schwefel and Metcam, a manufacturer of precision sheet-metal components and assemblies, with a unique opportunity to pursue pollution prevention initiatives.
 
Facing the challenge
Metcam manufactures components and assemblies for a broad range of industries, from telecommunications and electronics to medicine and food service. The company employs around 60 people at its 100,000 square foot plant in Alpharetta, Ga.

After the sheet-metal components are laser cut, punched, bent and welded, the parts move to the finishing department. Aluminum parts are subjected to a chrome conversion before some are powder coated. Cold rolled steel and galvanized parts are pretreated through a five-stage iron phosphate washer and powder coated.

This five-stage iron phosphate washer spray deserves a closer look.

  • Stage 1 involves a 1,250-gallon alkaline cleaner solution with surfactants operating at a 3.5 to 4 percent concentration, with water pressure of 15-18 psi at the nozzles and temperatures of 135°F. The alkaline cleaner removes oil and grease from the parts, thereby preparing them to accept the iron phosphate or powder coating. The sodium hydroxide solution is purchased as a liquid, which is formulated with a silicate builder and nonionic and anionic surfactants. Stage 1 is followed by a spray rinse (Stage 2) using city water.
  • Stage 3 centers on iron phosphating, which minimizes corrosion of the part. The first step is the dissolution of the metallic iron in a phosphoric acidic solution. As the acid attacks the metal surface, it is consumed, raising the pH of the liquid. The change in pH causes phosphate salts to precipitate and react with the metal surface, forming a crystalline coating that locks paints or powder onto the part and acts as a barrier to the flow of electrons. The third stage is followed by another spray wash (Stage 4) using city water.
  • Stage 5 is the non-chrome seal, which enhances under-paint corrosion resistance on the surface of the iron phosphate-coated steel.

Keeping the rinse water at a sufficiently high quality level is critical to the efficiency of the finishing process. The rinse from Stage 2 is particularly sensitive to the amount of oil carried over from the Stage 1 cleaner, and the Stage 3 process cannot operate effectively if more than 100 ml of oil per liter of rinse is carried over from Stage 2. To ensure process efficiency, Metcam was forced to dump Stage 2 rinse water every other production day. In addition, as the cleaner in Stage 1 approached its six-month bath life, the quality of the solution carrying over to Stage 2 deteriorated. Maintaining the quality of its finishing line was of paramount importance to Metcam, but it was also expensive. Metcam estimated that it spent $35,515 every year just to generate Stage 1 and Stage 2 wastewaters, with evaporation costing approximately $0.31 per gallon of wastewater.

Managing the wastewater it generated added even more cost and headaches. Without access to a sewer connection, Metcam weighed two options: sending the waste offsite for treatment and disposal, or reducing the waste by evaporator onsite and sending the residual sludge offsite for final disposal. Evaporation represented the most cost-effective solution, but Metcam recognized that minimizing or even eliminating wastewaters at their source would be a much more effective solution. Explained Schwefel, "We were interested in finding an alternative to the two traditional options available to metalworking operations. Fortunately, the state of Georgia was just as interested in finding alternative methods to minimize waste. With the help of the state's P2 division (P2AD), we entered into a program to test a pollution prevention option."

That option, one of three that had been considered, was ultrafiltration (UF). After more than six months of testing, the results are impressive.

 

Minimizing waste through ultrafiltration

Smaller washer apparatus


Metcam's filtration system reduces both Stage 1 and Stage 2 wastewater at the source, extends alkaline cleaner bath lives and reduces dump and recharge costs.

Unlike a traditional filtration system that can foul within a short period of time, a cross-flow filtration system lets the membrane surface receive continuous "sweeping," thereby limiting the fiber cake buildup and extending processing times. In a crossflow UF system, contaminated cleaner solution is pumped across the membrane at relatively low pressures. Solution flow is parallel to the filter pores while a tangential pressure transports water, dissolved salts/metals and low-molecular weight cleaner compounds through the membrane pores to the cleaner bath. All suspended solids and soluble materials rejected by the membrane move away in a continuous, turbulent flow at the membrane surface.

The UF system that Metcam employed was designed to separate high molecular weight, colloidal or suspended solids from water-based cleaning solutions. Constructed of a semi-permeable, sintered titanium dioxide membrane attached to a tubular, stainless steel substructure, the membrane had a nominal pore size of 0.1 microns.

The system configuration chosen by Metcam is known as "batch with recirculating loop, top-off." In this system, the feed rate to the process tank from Stage 1 is equal to the permeate flux rate. A counter-flow rinse system, which works synergistically with the UF system, ties Stage 2 and Stage 1 together, allowing for reuse of Stage 2 water to make up for Stage 1 evaporation and dragout losses.

 

Performance and results

Paint is applied after parts are cleaned and iron phosphated


Metcam's UF system was online independently from Jan. 2 to March 10, 2003; since then, the UF system has worked in conjunction with the automated rinse counterflow system. Of particular interest to Metcam and Georgia's P2AD was the system's ability to rejuvenate dirty cleaner bath and the extension of the bath's life before dumping and recharging was required. When the project started, the cleaner was judged to be equivalent to a six month bath. If the UF system could rejuvenate Stage 1 to the quality of a new bath, there was a solid likelihood that the system could keep the bath operating for a very long time without the need for dumping or recharging.

The UF system turned the 1,250 gallons over in just about ten days, transforming a cloudy, orange-brown liquid into a much clearer, orange-yellow bath after just one month. By April 2003, Metcam saw a steady performance in contaminant removal and recovery. "The system has been up and working," said Schwefel, "and the results are as good, or better, than we had anticipated. We've gone months without adding chemicals, and that saves money. We're well on our way to being ISO 14000-compliant, and our employees are working in an improved physical environment. But, we're also seeing some unexpected benefits. Our employees don't have to clean out the tanks nearly as often, and that's a dirty, messy job. And our customers are very positive because our quality has remained excellent at the same time that we've implemented these major environmental improvements. With this system, everyone wins." PE

 

Barbara Quinn has written about environmental, public policy and economic development issues for more than 25 years. Her work has been published in magazines that serve the industrial, environmental, municipal and business communities.

 

Copyright 1981-2007. All Rights Reserved. Arbortech Corporation 815-385-0001